0

Tried to get this cleared from the Implementation doc; but I could only get that Implication and Queries are similar beasts. I also read Simple Facts & Queries, but that did not help on this count.

I commented out the Query section in my rule file and processed. The Implications were not asserted...I check this by dumping all Facts to a flat file.

I was hoping that Implications get Asserted during Process, even without a query, so that I can persist all the Facts (basic Facts asserted from VB & Implicated Facts) in a DB and then use it for certain stuff. Any way out ?

Thanks

RTK
  • 15
  • 3
  • Indeed Implications get Asserted during Process and no Query is needed for this to happen, so really I don't get the issue you're facing. Maybe show a bit of configuration and what failed with it? – David Dossot Jun 01 '13 at 15:22
  • Sigh! Turns out the issue is me:-( I kept going up and down in the persisted Factfile for the Implications with Head & Body, without realizing that they would be asserted as a Fact atom. Thanks for the hint. – RTK Jun 02 '13 at 10:59

1 Answers1

0

Indeed Implications get Asserted during Process and no Query is needed for this to happen: there must be something else at play that makes the rules behave erratically.

David Dossot
  • 33,403
  • 4
  • 38
  • 72