The short answer: AFAIK No.
XML comments are useful for publicly exposed methods that will be used by third parties. Since nearly all public facing functionality I add to applications is done through contract interfaces, (aids in test-ability) I'll put the comments against the interface declaration and just use a <see cref="..."/> above the implementation.
Interface:
///<summary>
/// Provides so-in-so fetching functionality on the provided criteria.
/// Examples, parameters, etc.
///</summary>
IEnumarable<Something> FetchSomethingsBaseOnCriteria(params Criteria[] criteria);
Implementation
///<summary>
/// <see cref="ISomethingDoer.FetchSomethingsBasedOnCriteria"/>
///</summary>
IEnumarable<Something> ISomethingDoer.FetchSomethingsBaseOnCriteria(params Criteria[] criteria)
{
// Get fetching...
}
Not sure if most document generators have the smarts to resolve comments from the <see/> I believe Sandcastle has the <Inheritdoc/> tag which will allow it to take the base interface's comments. http://www.ewoodruff.us/shfbdocs/html/79897974-ffc9-4b84-91a5-e50c66a0221d.htm
Where you use polymorphic interfaces this may not work. (I don't think you can override declarations/comments in an intermediary interface)
For internal-use and private code I don't bother with comments as it's extra overhead often explaining the obvious. They're too easy to let fall out of sync in which case they start misleading users or need to be ignored. ("Comments lie." - Clean Code) I rely on BDD-styled unit tests to describe what I intend code to do, and descriptive code to describe itself.