The .NET Substring method is fraught with peril. I developed extension methods that handle a wide variety of scenarios. The nice thing is it preserves the original behavior, but when you add an additional "true" parameter, it then resorts to the extension method to handle the exception, and returns the most logical values, based on the index and length. For example, if length is negative, and counts backward. You can look at the test results with wide variety of values on the fiddle at: https://dotnetfiddle.net/m1mSH9. This will give you a clear idea on how it resolves substrings.
I always add these methods to all my projects, and never have to worry about code breaking, because something changed and the index is invalid. Below is the code.
public static String Substring(this String val, int startIndex, bool handleIndexException)
{
if (!handleIndexException)
{ //handleIndexException is false so call the base method
return val.Substring(startIndex);
}
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(val))
{
return val;
}
return val.Substring(startIndex < 0 ? 0 : startIndex > (val.Length - 1) ? val.Length : startIndex);
}
public static String Substring(this String val, int startIndex, int length, bool handleIndexException)
{
if (!handleIndexException)
{ //handleIndexException is false so call the base method
return val.Substring(startIndex, length);
}
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(val))
{
return val;
}
int newfrom, newlth, instrlength = val.Length;
if (length < 0) //length is negative
{
newfrom = startIndex + length;
newlth = -1 * length;
}
else //length is positive
{
newfrom = startIndex;
newlth = length;
}
if (newfrom + newlth < 0 || newfrom > instrlength - 1)
{
return string.Empty;
}
if (newfrom < 0)
{
newlth = newfrom + newlth;
newfrom = 0;
}
return val.Substring(newfrom, Math.Min(newlth, instrlength - newfrom));
}
I blogged about this back in May 2010 at: http://jagdale.blogspot.com/2010/05/substring-extension-method-that-does.html