21

In Teary Deary's Horrible Histories: London, he claims that green grapes cause more accidents on the London Underground (I presume subway) than banana peels.

This claim is also repeated in several forums or blogs:

However, I can find no statistics to back this up. Furthermore, all the statements seem to be exact copies of one another, indicating that they might have all came from a single false fact.

I wish to know if this claim is true.

Brythan
  • 10,162
  • 5
  • 46
  • 53
  • 12
    Banana peels do not cause a significant amount of accidents other than in slapstick comedies and old-school comics, [as proven by our most excellent and worthwhile scientific friends at M5 Industries](http://www.discovery.com/tv-shows/mythbusters/mythbusters-database/slip-and-fall-on-banana-peel/). –  Oct 18 '17 at 10:44
  • 1
    @MichaelKarnerfors there's actually some *serious* science on this: https://www.improbable.com/ig/winners/#ig2014 – Sklivvz Oct 18 '17 at 12:31
  • 3
    @Sklivvz Title: "Frictional Coefficient under Banana Skin". Measuring the friction coefficient is not the same as compiling accident statistics. Measuring friction can be part of a specific accident investigation, and a meta analysis of measured friction coefficients from selected accident investigations may be useful and possibly lead to the conclusion that "it is bad to transport yourself on slippery surfaces". However... just measuring the friction coefficient between a banana peel and floor(s) does not lead to the statement "There is a significant amount of banana peel slip accidents". –  Oct 18 '17 at 12:41
  • @MichaelKarnerfors - the claim that it's just a slapstick comedy trope dismisses the actual science that Sklivvz pointed out - that banana peels are, in truth, on of the most slippery substances known. He's not claiming that it causes more accidents, he's pointing out that it's not a phony invention that exists only in slapstick. https://www.sciencefriday.com/articles/what-would-happen-if-you-slipped-on-a-banana-peel/ – PoloHoleSet Oct 18 '17 at 14:02
  • 1
    @PoloHoleSet Read my exact wording: "Banana peels do not cause **a significant amount** of accidents other than in slapstick comedies". –  Oct 18 '17 at 14:26
  • 2
    @MichaelKarnerfors - okay, was there a point to creating a straw man to knock down? I'm failing to see where anyone, anywhere, ever claimed otherwise. – PoloHoleSet Oct 18 '17 at 14:58
  • 2
    @PoloHoleSet The claim being asked about seems to at least imply that there are a sufficient number of accidents involving both banana peels and grapes on London subways to make a statistically significant comparison between them. That was the most surprising part of the claim to me, personally. – reirab Oct 18 '17 at 16:54
  • 2
    @reirab - The original claim also seems to be knocking down a straw man, a swell, as evidenced by the last sentence of the answer, below. If I said that more people get injured in the London Underground by green grape slips than getting stepped on by elephants, I'd hope people wouldn't just assume there was an epidemic of elephant stompings going on. – PoloHoleSet Oct 18 '17 at 17:08
  • y'all, my link was to IgNobel prizes. It's serious science but not very useful :-) – Sklivvz Oct 18 '17 at 17:59
  • There is also the story of [Bobby Leach](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Leach) who defied death by going over Niagara Falls in a barrel and then ironically died from complications of a gangrene leg after an accident caused by slipping on a fruit peel. But it turns out it was actually an orange peel. I erroneously thought this was story was about a banana peel. My point is that we may be inadvertently lead to believe that banana peels are more trouble than they really are. – Octopus Oct 18 '17 at 20:17
  • Note that calling it is a subway is ambiguous - subways are footpaths that go beneath the road, to save crossing it. – Tim Oct 19 '17 at 00:44
  • I first read “green capes” and thought, *that’s* an interesting question, however, the actual question and answer still is very interesting. – Holger Oct 19 '17 at 06:28
  • @Tim I changed it on that basis, and it was added back in on the basis that " While subway may be wrong in UK, it is explanatory in US where underground means something different." – owjburnham Oct 19 '17 at 09:24
  • Grapes are slippery when squashed, and they're also small -- so harder to spot than banana skins. Darker grapes would be harder still to spot on most surfaces in the underground, so the *green* part at least seems like exaggeration in the name of a good story. – Chris H Oct 19 '17 at 10:28

1 Answers1

37

This is a claim that is really easy to make.

Banana peel hazards

Can you really slip on an old banana peel?:

The banana peel fall: It"s a myth […] Contrary to comedic genius, […] a single peel isn't a guaranteed fall magnet.

If the physics behind this gag is not as promising, then why invent such a comedic device?

QI Series H, Episode 12 (including video) - Horses And Hunting:

The early comedy cinema joke of slipping on a banana peel was a reference to slipping in horse manure. During the early days when cinema was considered an art form and they were worried that showing manure would cheapen the art, so they used a banana peel instead.

The Origin of the “Slipping on a Banana Peel” Comedy Gag

[…] banana peels in the streets began as a euphemism for something less edible. […] horses were the main mode of transportation. As the horses […] would leave large piles of their droppings. People were hired to clean this up, but in cities that didn’t provide this civil service, the piles sat unattended scattered through the city. Those who did not pay attention were liable to slip and fall into this rotting piles of horse manure. […] this was quite funny to onlookers. Since having people fall in big piles of horse manure on stage was both impractical and icky, the performers substituted banana peels. […] every city dweller knew what these banana peels stood for.

How Did Slipping on a Banana Peel Become a Comedy Staple?

People often tossed their garbage into the streets, leading to a general foul stench and public waste buildup. A fresh banana peel might seem non-threatening, but a rotting banana peel was a slime-covered booby trap.

Whether or not people frequently slipped on the rotten skins, the banana peel came to symbolize poor manners. Around 1880, Harper’s Weekly admonished anyone who tossed their banana peels on a public walkway, as this would likely result in broken limbs.

More on the origins of humour slippery fruit or leftovers and their evolution from Orange to Banana. But the real physics have been investigated:

The 2014 Ig Nobel Prize WinnersFrictional Coefficient under Banana Skin:

We measured the frictional coefficient under banana skin on floor material. Force transducer with six degrees of freedom was set under a flat panel of linoleum. Both frictional force and vertical force were simultaneously measured during a shoe sole was pushed and rubbed by a foot motion on the panel with banana skin. Measured frictional coefficient was about 0.07. This was much lower than the value on common materials and similar one on well lubricated surfaces. By the microscopic observation, it was estimated that polysaccharide follicular gel played the dominant role in lubricating effect of banana skin after the crush and the change to homogeneous sol.

Slipping on a banana peel is not impossible, but unlikely. Banana skins or green grapes as a cause of accident are therefore a risk, and they will have a relation to one another. But these incidents have to be measured against the absolute risk of fall related accidents to make them meaningful.

Over time, the sidewalk pratfall became less of a genuine hazard and more an essential element of slapstick comedy. [cited from Dan Koeppel: "Banana The Fate of the Fruit That Changed the World", Hudson Street Press: New York, 2008, p67.]

The statistics for tube accidents

More than 4,000 people injured on the Tube last year:

The vast majority of Jubilee Line accidents in the database appear to be comparatively minor injuries, such as cuts, sprains and bruises, which occur mostly on escalators. […] However, the figures also include over 50 fractures and 30 cases of dislocated joints – occurring more frequently on stairs than any other area of tube stations – as well as 15 electric shocks and six heart attacks.

Mind the gap: New Tube trains blamed for huge rise in passenger accidents:

Finn Brennan, Aslef district organiser, said: “There has been a particular problem at Baker Street as the design of the new S-stock trains meant an increased gap between the train and the platform and led to more incidents of people falling between them. Embankment and Finchley Road have similar issues.

“These figures demonstrate the pressure that train drivers and other staff are operating under as levels of overcrowding increase. It is only their professionalism that has meant many more people have not been seriously injured or killed when these incidents happen.”

This reveals the major causes of accidents: structural problems. It seems that neither bananas nor grapes are a major case of accidents in the tube. Since they should be cleaned up fairly quickly in a decently run society another major cause is cost cutting, or austerity.

Claims for London Underground injuries hit £2.5 million:

Bob Crow from Road Transport Union RMT said: “RMT has warned repeatedly that axing station and platform based staff would lead to an increase in accidents as the crew who keep an eye out for slips and trips hazards are cut back. These shocking statistics back up RMTs worst fears.

If there are slips then this seems to be a result of the precursor of the recent "war on terror". Without giving sources but iluminating another reason:

It is also statiscally proven that slipping on green grapes is the most frequent cause of accidents on the platforms and passageways of the Underground. More frequent even, and this may be surprising, than carelessly discarded banana skins; because rubbish bins are to be sought in vain on the platforms: they were removed because of the threat of the IRA hiding bombs in them, a threat that has continued from newer sources.

Safety key facts, passenger safety key facts, workforce safety key facts, public safety key facts, train accident safety key facts:

Slips, trips and falls, which are often a result of congestion or bad weather, accounted for the highest proportion of injuries on both the mainline network and London Underground in 2013-14. This category has accounted for the highest proportion of passenger injuries in every year of the time series.

Searching for images of the London Underground one has a really hard time finding anything lying around or dirt depicted. This is the dirtiest I could find:: Dirtiest Tube picture And this is a more typical example: Typically squeaky clean And that's because of them: Cleaning  troopers

The fact that the claim uses "green grapes" and that this is repeated everywhere specifically nurtures some suspicion: Why are the grapes green? Why is it surprising that a material that is softer and more moist than a banana is also more slippery? Where are the hard statistics on that instead of mere claims of fact? Do you slip on a single grape? Are green grapes more slippery than other colours? (Slipping on many grapes does occur – elsewhere – and is compensated.) The claim is repeated often, identical and never with sources. It all points into one direction: Urban legend.

tl;dr

Since almost no-one slips on banana peels this is a straw man statistic, that might very well be true –  but is irrelevant in reality today. It just serves to educate the public on morality.

LangLаngС
  • 44,005
  • 14
  • 173
  • 172
  • 10
    Good writing should be clear and concise. Your "Banana Peel Hazards" section doubles the length of your answer, but is only tangentially relevant to your final point. The evidence presented is either ambiguous, or not up to skeptics standards. I know you worked hard, but that section is just not contributing. Your last section is very relevant and makes a clear point that is specific to the question being asked. I suggest that you completely cut your first section or severely summarize it. – BobTheAverage Oct 18 '17 at 13:37
  • 1
    The 3 September 1874 *Forest and Stream* discusses Henry Chadwick (famous for writing about baseball and cricket) slipping on a banana peel, after which his head was stuck by the wheel of a cart. https://books.google.com/books?id=N92aNqYn9VsC&pg=PA54&dq=banana+peel+fall&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjvu_DSr_rWAhWJwiYKHTZEACwQ6AEISjAH#v=onepage&q=banana%20peel%20fall&f=false – DavePhD Oct 18 '17 at 14:29
  • 6
    @BobTheAverage I think it adds. It perhaps ought to be an answer to it's *own* question about people slipping on banana peels in general, but it certainly gave me more of the insight that I come to this site for. – Ben Barden Oct 18 '17 at 16:06
  • 1
    Since the question is not about the origins of the banana-peel gag, that part of this answer seems unnecessary, and it makes me reluctant to upvote because I feel like I should check if that part is true before voting this post up. (A site like "Today I Found Out" seems more like a source for claims to check than a good source for backing up claims.) – paradisi Oct 18 '17 at 16:13
  • My guess is grapes (and perhaps green grapes particularly) are a more popular snack than bananas, and/or that a single grape is both more easily dropped (by accident rather than littering) and harder to see from a distance and avoid than a banana peel. – Random832 Oct 18 '17 at 17:41
  • I admit I wasn't around (or at least not living in cities :-)) during the time when movies and horse-powered urban transit overlapped, but I have to wonder about the bananas as substitute for slipping in horse manure. As a horse owner, I'm quite familiar with the substance, and it's really not all that slippery. Cow manure is a different matter. – jamesqf Oct 18 '17 at 17:42
  • 9
    @DavePhD You have an unlimited ability to find obscure yet incredibly specific facts. What the heck do you google to find historical accounts of people slipping on banana peels? – BobTheAverage Oct 18 '17 at 18:28
  • @LangLangC: 1) I didn't realize we were discussing London in particular. You mentioned it in the context of movies, which brings Hollywood to mind, which is not a place noted for its raininess. 2) Just about everything, including bare pavement, gets slipprier when it's wet. – jamesqf Oct 19 '17 at 04:32